Why I Began Asking Questions
Why do I care about the Davis Joint Unified School District’s ongoing campaign to stop school closures?
Frankly, beyond having an opinion like many others in our community, I didn’t. Until the District failed to honor a written commitment made to Palomino Place, LLC regarding new school construction fees.
Then, we were prepared to pay the approximately $1.5 million in new school fees required. However, while the District was considering imposing nearly $1 million in additional fees, the Superintendent provided written confirmation that Palomino Place homeowners would not be charged these new fees. Relying on that commitment, I guaranteed the builders’ school fees accordingly.
Six months later, after the legal deadline to challenge implementation of the new fee passed, the District reversed its written commitment to me.
The resulting litigation required me to work closely with my attorneys to examine the District’s historical data, public statements, financial records, enrollment projections, and its fee justifications. That research raised issues beyond our dispute:
- Why impose fees that state law limits to the construction of new schools when the District does not need additional schools? It has a surplus.
- Why continue operating two elementary schools and with the associated financial drain of District resources when enrollment data and projections do not support keeping them open?
- How are parcel-tax revenues being used, and to what extent are Davis parents and other taxpayers subsidizing services for students who don’t live here and whose parents do not pay our parcel taxes; taking resources away from our Davis students?
The documents presented on this website are intended to allow Davis parents, homeowners, and taxpayers to examine these issues for themselves.
Finally, what’s really driving all the District’s decisions? Better quality of education for Davis children or supporting the Bureaucracy and those who personally financially benefit by these decisions.
Published Advertisements
The Documents
-
Letter to Superintendent Matt Best My attorneys set out the law for the Superintendent after we met. Once our application was filed, the District could not charge a fee adopted later. Open Document A
-
Email response from Superintendent Matt Best His answer, in writing: he agreed. Palomino Place would be exempt from any increase the Board adopted. Open Document B
-
Response and acknowledgment We wrote back to confirm the terms and the timing. I guaranteed the builders’ school fees on that basis. Open Document C
-
On Education, Accountability, and the Price of Pretending: Part One Why I filed suit. State law limits these fees to building schools for children generated by new homes. The District has 1,400 empty seats. Open Document D
-
Low enrollment hits school funds In 2021 CalMatters columnist Dan Walters described the enrollment decline now driving these decisions. Open Document E
-
On Education, Accountability and the Price of Pretending: Part II What this costs everyone else. The District’s own study ignored the 1,200 students who commute in daily. Open Document F
-
Davis school enrollment has fallen for years Sacramento Bee reporter Daniel Lempres on the District’s latest figures: total enrollment down more than 5% since 2019-20, kindergarten down just over 20%. Open Document G
-
State letter on school fee vesting The state housing department told Berkeley Unified it could not charge a housing project a higher school fee after the project’s preliminary application locked in the fee. Open Document H
Questions or Comments?
Contact us.